Showing posts with label Losers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Losers. Show all posts

Earth Day: You Don't Support Murder, Do You?

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Earth Day was founded by Ira Einhorn, the Unicorn Killer, to honor Lenin's 100th birthday. The Unicorn Killer killed Holly Maddux and stuffed her in a trunk where she mummified.  His lawyer was Arlen Spector, who would become a liberal senator until Pat Toomey defeated him in 2010 (hopefully). Supporting Earth Day is supporting a murderer. You don't support murder, do you?

American Idol President to Appear on...American Idol?

Monday, April 12, 2010

This just in...

Barack Hussein Obama and his leading lady will appear in their most important roles yet...the roles they were destined to play...the American Idol president will appear on...American Idol!

He's been worshipped as an idol for years now by the left...now he's going to appear on the show the left uses to pick their idols...American Idol.

He was so great...he became an American Idol without ever appearing on American Idol...until now!

Leftist news agencies have proposed picking our presidents like American Idol...now the American Idol president...on American Idol!

Maybe he'll impress Simon...with a few verses of...Barack Hussein Obama...Mmm...Mmm...Mmm!

Though he'll probably just make a pitch for charity...while his own half-brother lives in a hut...on $12 a year!

The shallow celebrity president...showcased on America's showcase...for shallow celebrity worship!

Barack Hussein Obama...appearing on Idol Gives Back...though the idol won't give back our freedoms!

Barack Hussein Obama...further degrading the office of the presidency...Wednesday, April 21, 2010 at 8:00 P.M. ET on FOX.

LoudounI.com Poll Incompetence: If the members of Loudoun's Board of Supervisors were all up for re-election today, who would you want voted out of office?

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Sorry I haven't posted anything in a while, I've been dealing with some family issues.

I'm a little late on this topic, but I have some interesting insights on it.  Recently, LoudounI.com had the following online poll:

If the members of Loudoun's Board of Supervisors were all up for re-election today, who would you want voted out of office?

Stevens Miller (D-Dulles), extreme leftist, was winning the poll (to be voted out of office).  Then, a voting-bot was obviously put into use by the left-wingers to try to force Eugene Delgaudio (R-Sterling), conservative patriot to win the poll.  I seriously doubt this was illegal since the bots were merely voting, not trying to cause a Denial of Service or gain access to server.  Rather, it exposes incompetence in the management of the online poll because there are relatively simple ways to prevent this from happening if the webmaster put enough value in the poll to take the time to secure it.

The poll uses (it's still open) a simple HTML form that submits an HTTP POST request to transmit the vote and an ID for the poll itself, not the particular vote.  It is very easy to generate an HTTP POST request from any computer or server, submit it to the poll server, and vote, over and over again automatically.

One way the webmaster could deter this without out too much server-side tracking is to include two hidden form fields, a timestamp and an encoded version of the timestamp that was hashed with another value by a function on the server.  Each time someone loads the poll web page, the values would be different.  When the poll is submitted, the timestamp and the encoded version can checked for tampering (the timestamp field in the submitted vote re-encoded by the server should equal the encoded version in the submitted vote).  To detect machine submissions, use the timestamp to make sure the vote wasn't submitted faster than humanly possible.

No online poll can ever be considered accurate, but polls where the webmaster doesn't even attempt to deter vote-bots are totally worthless.

Until LoudounI.com, secures their online polls, their polls aren't worth the time to read the results.

UPDATE:   I just saw this article: Editorial: Listening to You

This week’s poll took off, largely due to its asking readers to announce the support (or lack thereof) of the Board of Supervisors and its members. While we feel that these surveys are valuable in taking a “room temperature” of public sentiment, the polls are not intended as a scientific study. As with any online poll, there is certainly the possibility of multiple votes being cast by the same person.
The red section above should read:
As with any online poll [ON OUR WEBSITE], there is certainly the possibility [GUARANTEE] of multiple votes being cast by the same person.
If you don't at least attempt to stop poll-bots, you're guaranteed to have them destroy the results of your poll whenever the two sides of an issue get fired up on a contentious issue.

I Can't Wait to See the Looks on King Kaine the Tyrannical and Obama's Faces On Nov. 3!

Sunday, October 25, 2009

King Kaine the Tyrannical and Barack Hussein Obama (Mmm...Mmm...Mmm...) thought they turned Virginia blue. I can't wait to see the looks on their faces on the night of November 3 when Virginia's true RED colors shine through and we win triple landslides! Imagine the extra insult to injury if Jon Corzine is tossed out in New Jersey too!

The glorious signs of big, looming Democrat sufferings are all over the SurveyUSA poll released on October 20 showing Bob McDonnell ahead by 19 points, Bill Bolling ahead by 14 points, and Ken Cuccinelli ahead by 15 points. Remember, when Democrats suffer defeat, America wins, Virginia wins, freedom wins, capitalism wins, and real Americans win!

Now, on to my analysis of the poll:

The poll sampled
900 Virginian adults from October 17-19, 2009. 814 of those sampled were registered to vote and 595 were judged to be likely voters. 195 (33%) of these likely voters described themselves as Republicans, 191 (32%) as Democrats, and 197 (33%) as Independents. 252 (43%) described themselves as conservative, 236 (40%) as moderate, and 78 (13%) as liberal. 297 (50%) were men and 298 (50%) were women. Note, that unlike many other polls in this race, this poll sampled party affiliation fairly evenly.

In the Race for Governor:
Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4%
McDonnell: 59% (+19%)
Deeds: 40%
Undecided: 1%

McDonnell is leading with men and women, all age groups, Republicans, Independents, college grads and non-college grads, rich and poor, McCain voters, and in all regions of the Commonwealth.

McDonnell has the support of 71% of Independents, but only 44% of Moderates compared to Deeds's 55% support. This underscores the reason why Republicans need to run and govern as principled conservatives to win over the Independents instead of moderating to them. Independents are not all wishing-washy moderates. Many hold conservative views, but may not realize that they are really conservatives. A conservative, articulate candidate will win them over by being conservative in principle and practice, not by being a spineless moderate.

He's also winning the support of 12% of Democrats, 9% of Liberals, and 19% of Obama voters.

Plus, only 1% of voters are still undecided! I really hope this landslide comes to fruition! Just imagine the looks on Obama and his lackey Kaine's deceitful faces!

In the Race for Lieutenant Governor:
Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.1%
Bolling: 56% (+14%)
Wagner: 42%
Undecided: 2%

Bolling is also leading with men and women, all age groups, Republicans, Independents, college grads and non-college grads, rich and poor, McCain voters, and in all regions of the Commonwealth.

He's got the support of 64% of Independents, while losing the Moderates, underscoring my previous point again about not moderating to the Independents.

12% of Democrats, 9% of Liberals, and 15% of Obama voters support Bill Bolling.

Only 2% are undecided!

In the Race for Attorney General:
Margin of Sampling Error: +/-4.1%
Cuccinelli: 56% (+15%)
Shannon: 41%
Undecided: 2%

Cuccinelli is also leading with men and women, all age groups, Republicans, Independents, college grads and non-college grads, rich and poor, McCain voters, and in all regions of the Commonwealth except the Southeast.

Many of those supposedly on the right claimed that Cuccinelli was doomed to fail because he was too conservative to get elected. In light of these predictions, let's see how the most conservative candidate on the ticket is fairing with non-right-wingers compared with McDonnell and Bolling:

Democrat support:
1) Cuccinelli: 14% to 84%
2) Bolling: 12% to 86%
3) McDonnell: 12% to 87%

Independent support:
1) McDonnell: 71% to 27%
2) Cuccinelli: 67% to 30%
3) Bolling: 64% to 34%

Moderate support:
1) Cuccinelli: 44% to 53%
2) McDonnell: 44% to 55%
3) Bolling: 42% to 55%

Liberal support:

1) Cuccinelli: 14% to 85%
2) Bolling: 9% to 90%
3) McDonnell: 9% to 91%

Cuccinelli is indisputably the most conservative candidate on the ticket both in principle and practice, yet he has the most support amongst non-right-wingers!

Only 2% undecided in this race!

Summary:
Let's hope these numbers are correct. Public Policy Polling is also showing growing leads, and they've had problems with Democrat bias in the past in Virginia. Rush Limbaugh has also exposed Public Policy Polling's liberal bias too many times to count over the years. I just hope King Kaine the Tyrannical will have to move mountain...move (ala his DNC Convention speech) a mountain of tears from his face along with Obama!

Sing with me:
He takes a tissue from the box, mmm...mmm...mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, to wipe and dry his crying face, mmm...mmm...mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, Virginia's red and he is blue, mmm...mmm...mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, his lackey Kaine saved not his face, mmm...mmm...mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, he sealed their fate with his disgrace, mmm...mmm...mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, failures are the liberals' fate, mmm...mmm...mmm, Barack Hussein Obama, Barack Hussein Obama...

Washington Post Endorses "Dirty" Deeds

Monday, October 19, 2009

We all knew it was coming. The Washington Post endorsed Democrat Creigh Deeds for governor here in the Commonwealth of Virginia on Sunday. Well, actually, a liberal paper from the most liberal place in the country, the District of Columbia, endorsed a liberal in the governor's race here in Virginia from within the limits of the District of Columbia. They want to make the Commonwealth of Virginia, where capitalism first arrived in America in 1607, like their little socialist "paradise" in the District.

They've endorsed him, so now I'm going to tear apart the Post's arguments using the weight of their own arguments:

1) They claim that "Mr. McDonnell has staked out the intolerant terrain on his party's right wing, fighting a culture war that seized his imagination as a law student in the Reagan era" and "[d]espite his rural roots, Mr. Deeds has been ideologically flexible enough to support abortion rights; press for background checks on firearms buyers at gun shows; oppose displaying the Confederate flag on state license plates; and warm to equal rights for homosexuals."

Excuse me, but abortion, guns, free-speech, and the gay agenda are key battles in the culture war! So, if you agree with the Post on all of these issues and have worked to implement them, you've "compiled a moderate record on divisive social issues that reflects Virginia's status as a centrist swing state." But, if you're on the other side of the Post regarding these issues, you're "intolerant" and "fighting a culture war."

Maybe the culture war is like the Global War on Terror under Bill Clinton, one side declared war and is fighting, while the other is doing nothing (oops, I forgot about Monica!). But then the Obama administration did say that us right-wingers and our soldiers are terrorists and the Post is simply a parrot of the Obama administration, so I guess that comparison is apt.

2) The Post correctly claims that "Mr. McDonnell has sought to corner Mr. Deeds by focusing on debates in Washington over energy policy, labor union membership and other contentious federal issues." And quite successfully, I might add. But the b.s. begins again in the next sentence: "But a governor of Virginia can do little to influence the ideologically charged debates raging on Capitol Hill."

Hello, the U.S. Constitution does not enumerate powers to the federal government "over energy policy, labor union membership and [most] other contentious federal issues." So, by the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, these powers "are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Therefore, the governor and legislature of Virginia have these powers and they are being usurped by an out-of-control federal government. It is the duty of the governor and attorney general to defend the sovereignty of the Commonwealth of Virginia against federal encroachment and dare I say, nullify these intrusions within the borders of the Commonwealth if all else fails.

3) They claim that "[g]leeful Republicans, convinced that Mr. Deeds has dealt his own candidacy a lethal blow by his stance on taxes, have seized on it as evidence that Mr. Deeds is heedless of the financial strains on ordinary Virginians." Yes, that is Deeds to a T, but the Post goes on to say that "[a] recession is no time to raise taxes, [Republicans] say; never mind that any solution is unlikely to be in place until recovery is underway."

Well that's quite a load, isn't it? Yes, the roads won't be built for quite some time, thanks to the enviro-Marxists and assessment after assessment that will be needed to placate their anti-human agenda and skyrocket costs so we'll think twice before we drive anywhere.

But, the taxes will probably go into effect immediately, or the next July 1st after the passage of the massive bill produced by the "bipartisan [i.e., partisan] commission [Deeds dictates] to forge [i.e., ram through] a consensus [of tax-hiking liberals] on transportation funding [i.e., taxes], with the full expectation that new [astronomically-excessive] taxes would be part of the mix." Think back to the bipartisan, unconstitutional, 2007 "transportation" debacle that Democrats love to blame on Republicans, despite the fact that King Kaine the Tyrannical was knee deep in that mess, as were many Democrats. Remember Kaine stripped the language from the abusive fees section, making them only apply to Virginia drivers. As horrendous a concept it was before Kaine did his dirty work, he made it worse.

More analysis to come...